<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meretzky on Infocom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Montfort</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/comment-page-1/#comment-474267</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Montfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/#comment-474267</guid>
		<description>SM stands for Master of Science (in Latin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SM stands for Master of Science (in Latin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josemanuel</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/comment-page-1/#comment-473860</link>
		<dc:creator>josemanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2009/04/19/meretzky-on-infocom/#comment-473860</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with this: «One thing that helped was [that] a game really was one person&#039;s effort. It was much easier for one individual to put their stamp of vision and direction onto a game. Since the cost of developing a game was so much less, companies could really afford to be more experimental.»

By the way, what does SM &#039;79 (or &#039;98 or &#039;04) stand for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with this: «One thing that helped was [that] a game really was one person&#8217;s effort. It was much easier for one individual to put their stamp of vision and direction onto a game. Since the cost of developing a game was so much less, companies could really afford to be more experimental.»</p>
<p>By the way, what does SM &#8217;79 (or &#8217;98 or &#8217;04) stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

