<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Process of &#8220;The IBM Poem&#8221; by Emmett Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:44:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ivor Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-314110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivor Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-314110</guid>
		<description>I have been programming for years and have written a few poetry generators. I never found any of them to be much good. The problem with poetry, if one can call it that, is the fact that it is so human. It is full of cultural and gender references that are beyond programming in simply linguistic terms. Turing and Wittgenstein have considered these two aspects, at the philosophical level, over fifty years ago. Still one day perhaps a poem will pass the &quot;turing test&quot;. Software and AI has no response to the question, &quot;what is reality?&quot; Poetry does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been programming for years and have written a few poetry generators. I never found any of them to be much good. The problem with poetry, if one can call it that, is the fact that it is so human. It is full of cultural and gender references that are beyond programming in simply linguistic terms. Turing and Wittgenstein have considered these two aspects, at the philosophical level, over fifty years ago. Still one day perhaps a poem will pass the &#8220;turing test&#8221;. Software and AI has no response to the question, &#8220;what is reality?&#8221; Poetry does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Text Auto &#187; Codework Positions and Engagements</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-281493</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Text Auto &#187; Codework Positions and Engagements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-281493</guid>
		<description>[...] the one about the relationship between creative writing and programming? Maybe not, but my posts on on Emmett Williams&#8217;s IBM Poem and programs Ted Nelson likes were from there. Nineteen short position papers from the workshop are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the one about the relationship between creative writing and programming? Maybe not, but my posts on on Emmett Williams&#8217;s IBM Poem and programs Ted Nelson likes were from there. Nineteen short position papers from the workshop are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Smith</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-238796</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-238796</guid>
		<description>Hmm, not very good poetry :) I wrote a simple Prolog poetry generator which produces (near) grammatical sentences from a simple grammar. If you&#039;re interested, you&#039;re more than welcome to a copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, not very good poetry :) I wrote a simple Prolog poetry generator which produces (near) grammatical sentences from a simple grammar. If you&#8217;re interested, you&#8217;re more than welcome to a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris funkhouser</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-232180</link>
		<dc:creator>chris funkhouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-232180</guid>
		<description>hi Chris,
The way Williams explains it in _A Valentine for Noel_ (Something Else, 1973) is that in &#039;65 he--after someone asked him if he wanted &quot;to do something with a computer&quot;--automated a process he devised in &#039;55. I don&#039;t know who influenced who, but certainly these artists knew each other and doing procedural works seemed to be part of the spirit of the time. In any case, to read my recent lecture on the IBM poem see http://web.njit.edu/~funkhous/2008/machine/ - ok - cfunk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Chris,<br />
The way Williams explains it in _A Valentine for Noel_ (Something Else, 1973) is that in &#8216;65 he&#8211;after someone asked him if he wanted &#8220;to do something with a computer&#8221;&#8211;automated a process he devised in &#8216;55. I don&#8217;t know who influenced who, but certainly these artists knew each other and doing procedural works seemed to be part of the spirit of the time. In any case, to read my recent lecture on the IBM poem see <a href="http://web.njit.edu/~funkhous/2008/machine/" rel="nofollow">http://web.njit.edu/~funkhous/2008/machine/</a> &#8211; ok &#8211; cfunk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-230403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-230403</guid>
		<description>Oh wow, thanks for this. I didn&#039;t realize that Williams had worked with expansion-by-letters (which I have also worked with). I first saw that idea done by Jackson Mac Low in his Stanzas for Iris Lezak, which include a set of poems using similar methods -- the &quot;3rd Asymmetry for Iris&quot;, for instance, dated 23 Sept 1960, is the most clearly like this, although it pulls its words from another source text. (It&#039;s reprinted in the recent selected Mac Low, Thing of Beauty.) Anyway, Mac Low&#039;s book wasn&#039;t published until 1971, but it was published by Something Else Press, which had also published Williams, so I don&#039;t know whether Williams would have heard about this idea from Mac Low or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow, thanks for this. I didn&#8217;t realize that Williams had worked with expansion-by-letters (which I have also worked with). I first saw that idea done by Jackson Mac Low in his Stanzas for Iris Lezak, which include a set of poems using similar methods &#8212; the &#8220;3rd Asymmetry for Iris&#8221;, for instance, dated 23 Sept 1960, is the most clearly like this, although it pulls its words from another source text. (It&#8217;s reprinted in the recent selected Mac Low, Thing of Beauty.) Anyway, Mac Low&#8217;s book wasn&#8217;t published until 1971, but it was published by Something Else Press, which had also published Williams, so I don&#8217;t know whether Williams would have heard about this idea from Mac Low or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-229737</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-229737</guid>
		<description>Arg! I&#039;ve fixed my mistake - sorry, Rita.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arg! I&#8217;ve fixed my mistake &#8211; sorry, Rita.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita R</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/comment-page-1/#comment-229735</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2008/04/04/process-of-the-ibm-poem-by-emmett-williams/#comment-229735</guid>
		<description>raley/cayley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raley/cayley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
