<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lost Boys of Hacker Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-152821</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/#comment-152821</guid>
		<description>What I find somewhat interesting is that the same lamentation about long-gone hacker culture has been present almost as long as hacker culture has. Issues of &lt;i&gt;Phrack&lt;/i&gt; dating back to the mid-1980s contain that sentiment, and it was certainly ubiquitous in my BBS days (admittedly during the last gasps of the BBS in the mid-1990s). I&#039;m somewhat skeptical of the mythology, although undoubtedly stuff has changed---but a big complicated mess of stuff, including both technology and culture. In a lot of cases I think there&#039;s been a professionalization of specific &quot;institutions&quot; as people grown up, such as &lt;i&gt;Phrack&lt;/i&gt; magazine, which are then just replaced by a new generation of stuff by-teenagers-for-teenagers, which causes the mistaken impression that teenagers are no longer doing anything.

As far as actual &quot;exploits&quot;, a lot of the tools-of-the-trade of teenage crackers, which consist basically of reverse-engineering a handful of relatively simple cracks that they pass around through whatever the forum of the day is (plus the obligatory passing around of bomb-making textfiles), are still pretty effective. When I was playing around with that stuff in the mid-90s it was pretty easy to get shell accounts on US military servers (prized so you could go on IRC with an army.mil hostname) by digging around for common Perl-script programming errors involving failure to sanitize inputs for shell metacharacters. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if you can still do something comparable these days. An increasing share of effort these days is also directed at cracking hardware devices instead of breaking into servers---there&#039;s a pretty impressive steady stream of people, many of them teenagers, cracking Apple products, DVD encryption standards, and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find somewhat interesting is that the same lamentation about long-gone hacker culture has been present almost as long as hacker culture has. Issues of <i>Phrack</i> dating back to the mid-1980s contain that sentiment, and it was certainly ubiquitous in my BBS days (admittedly during the last gasps of the BBS in the mid-1990s). I&#8217;m somewhat skeptical of the mythology, although undoubtedly stuff has changed&#8212;but a big complicated mess of stuff, including both technology and culture. In a lot of cases I think there&#8217;s been a professionalization of specific &#8220;institutions&#8221; as people grown up, such as <i>Phrack</i> magazine, which are then just replaced by a new generation of stuff by-teenagers-for-teenagers, which causes the mistaken impression that teenagers are no longer doing anything.</p>
<p>As far as actual &#8220;exploits&#8221;, a lot of the tools-of-the-trade of teenage crackers, which consist basically of reverse-engineering a handful of relatively simple cracks that they pass around through whatever the forum of the day is (plus the obligatory passing around of bomb-making textfiles), are still pretty effective. When I was playing around with that stuff in the mid-90s it was pretty easy to get shell accounts on US military servers (prized so you could go on IRC with an army.mil hostname) by digging around for common Perl-script programming errors involving failure to sanitize inputs for shell metacharacters. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if you can still do something comparable these days. An increasing share of effort these days is also directed at cracking hardware devices instead of breaking into servers&#8212;there&#8217;s a pretty impressive steady stream of people, many of them teenagers, cracking Apple products, DVD encryption standards, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Scott</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-152700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grandtextauto.org/2007/11/25/the-lost-boys-of-hacker-culture/#comment-152700</guid>
		<description>Be sure to check my errata list on that book:
http://hacker.textfiles.com/errata/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sure to check my errata list on that book:<br />
<a href="http://hacker.textfiles.com/errata/" rel="nofollow">http://hacker.textfiles.com/errata/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

