<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Man&#8217;s Rubbish, Another Man&#8217;s Canon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2005/04/17/one-mans-rubbish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2005/04/17/one-mans-rubbish/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh g.</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2005/04/17/one-mans-rubbish/comment-page-1/#comment-47074</link>
		<dc:creator>josh g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=758#comment-47074</guid>
		<description>Looks like this might be a case of exaggerated un-news:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050420-4827.html

(Yes, the source is a PC techie website, but apparently a newswriter there is studying papyrology.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like this might be a case of exaggerated un-news:</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050420-4827.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050420-4827.html</a></p>
<p>(Yes, the source is a PC techie website, but apparently a newswriter there is studying papyrology.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2005/04/17/one-mans-rubbish/comment-page-1/#comment-47073</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=758#comment-47073</guid>
		<description>This&#039;ll be quite interesting!  FWIW, Oxyrhynchus wasn&#039;t completely useless even before this---there were actually quite a few papyri legible to the naked eye, found during excavations dating back to the 1880s.  There&#039;s a pretty good overview &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyrhynchus&quot;&gt;at Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This&#8217;ll be quite interesting!  FWIW, Oxyrhynchus wasn&#8217;t completely useless even before this&#8212;there were actually quite a few papyri legible to the naked eye, found during excavations dating back to the 1880s.  There&#8217;s a pretty good overview <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyrhynchus">at Wikipedia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

