<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toward a Theory of Interactive Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2003/12/19/toward-a-theory-of-interactive-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/12/19/toward-a-theory-of-interactive-fiction/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/12/19/toward-a-theory-of-interactive-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=160#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Cool. Incidentally, that article is the star of my new media studies unit on Interactive Fiction. I just read four final papers which cited it (to varying degrees of effectiveness) -- including one which used it to argue that MMORPGs (specifically Ultima) are in fact literature, since they meet so many of Montfort&#039;s criteria for interactive fiction.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Incidentally, that article is the star of my new media studies unit on Interactive Fiction. I just read four final papers which cited it (to varying degrees of effectiveness) &#8212; including one which used it to argue that MMORPGs (specifically Ultima) are in fact literature, since they meet so many of Montfort&#8217;s criteria for interactive fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

