<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game studies hits the academic mainstream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grandtextauto.org/2003/08/27/game-studies-hits-the-academic-mainstream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/08/27/game-studies-hits-the-academic-mainstream/</link>
	<description>A group blog about computer narrative, games, poetry, and art.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 01:52:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/08/27/game-studies-hits-the-academic-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Note that the questions &quot;Are video games a valid academic field of research?&quot; and &quot;Will video games one day become a teaching tool in the classroom?&quot; have nothing at all to do with one another. Sculpture can be a valid academic field of research (for art historians, for instance) even if we don&#039;t ever use sculptures as teaching tools in the classroom. I happen to think that both are true - video games both can be teaching tools and they are worthy of scholarship - but these are two separate issues. They just happen to be confusingly juxtaposed here so as to suggest that they are related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that the questions &#8220;Are video games a valid academic field of research?&#8221; and &#8220;Will video games one day become a teaching tool in the classroom?&#8221; have nothing at all to do with one another. Sculpture can be a valid academic field of research (for art historians, for instance) even if we don&#8217;t ever use sculptures as teaching tools in the classroom. I happen to think that both are true &#8211; video games both can be teaching tools and they are worthy of scholarship &#8211; but these are two separate issues. They just happen to be confusingly juxtaposed here so as to suggest that they are related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis G. Jerz</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/08/27/game-studies-hits-the-academic-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis G. Jerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Hmm... well, given that the intended readership of The Chronicle is mostly college professors (and administrators and advanced grad students on the job market, of course), I think the &quot;are video games yet another distraction&quot; can be construed to mean &quot;distraction from established subjects and modes of research that tenure committess traditionally reward as well as from from traditional teaching methods.&quot;&lt;p&gt;Yes, the juxtaposition is a bit heavy-handed, but the text cited is a marketing teaser designed to attract people with strong opinions. I&#039;m not defending the accuracy of the text, I&#039;m simply pointing out that its purpose is (sadly) not to be accurate but to generate a response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, and apropos of nothing at all, it&#039;s 5:52 by my watch, but the datestamp for the post reads 5:10.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; well, given that the intended readership of The Chronicle is mostly college professors (and administrators and advanced grad students on the job market, of course), I think the &#8220;are video games yet another distraction&#8221; can be construed to mean &#8220;distraction from established subjects and modes of research that tenure committess traditionally reward as well as from from traditional teaching methods.&#8221;
<p>Yes, the juxtaposition is a bit heavy-handed, but the text cited is a marketing teaser designed to attract people with strong opinions. I&#8217;m not defending the accuracy of the text, I&#8217;m simply pointing out that its purpose is (sadly) not to be accurate but to generate a response.</p>
<p>Incidentally, and apropos of nothing at all, it&#8217;s 5:52 by my watch, but the datestamp for the post reads 5:10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://grandtextauto.org/2003/08/27/game-studies-hits-the-academic-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-289</guid>
		<description>The transcript of the chat can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://chronicle.com/colloquylive/2003/08/video/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The transcript of the chat can be found <a href="http://chronicle.com/colloquylive/2003/08/video/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
